tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8308729492740986513.post3122138771717352132..comments2023-10-12T04:41:56.140-07:00Comments on Thesauros: The 1.6% solutionThesauroshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13305052511095551483noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8308729492740986513.post-34060315375921425002010-04-18T10:00:58.670-07:002010-04-18T10:00:58.670-07:00May Jesus the Christ forgive me for being a fool a...May Jesus the Christ forgive me for being a fool and for not believing that He rose from the dead. May He show mercy on my sinful skepticism.<br /><br />I have no problem whatsoever with Christians loving their enemies and thinking of others more highly than themselves. That's noble. I respect that. Honestly.<br /><br />I don't think that the people who wrote the New Testament were evil. But the Buddha was teaching these things 500 before Jesus. I'd say there's either been some plagiarism, or Jesus was a Buddhist Himself.<br /><br />See this<a href="http://www.jesusisbuddha.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jesusisbuddha.com/</a><br /><br />I am convinced that Christianity emerged from the attempt to merge Buddhist beliefs with Judaism.<br /><br />Peace be with you.Gun-Toting Atheisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16257243603888510320noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8308729492740986513.post-2748696354313599862010-04-18T03:27:49.205-07:002010-04-18T03:27:49.205-07:00A One-percenter is an outlaw biker.
It has been r...A One-percenter is an outlaw biker.<br /><br /><i>It has been reported that the press asked the American Motorcyclist Association (AMA) to comment on the Hollister incident, and their response was that 99% of motorcyclists were law-abiding citizens, and the last one percent were outlaws. Thus was born the term "one percenter.</i>"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8308729492740986513.post-15453344185202787902010-04-17T21:44:19.076-07:002010-04-17T21:44:19.076-07:00Who are these one percenters?
Rod, aka Makarios, ...<i>Who are these one percenters?</i><br /><br />Rod, aka Makarios, aka Thesauros, cannot read statistics properly. Therefore he uses a fake statistics. From Wikipedia, we can read that:<br /><br /><i>The most recent ARIS report, released March 9, 2009, found in 2008, 34.2 million Americans (15.0%) claim no religion. Of which, <b>1.6% explicitly describe themselves as atheist or agnostic</b></i><br /><br />Obviously, that is the 1.6% he is aiming at, but he just won't admit that he was wrong to present that as being 1.6% of North America, since it's just in the USA, and he is also wrong based on the fact that it includes both people call themselves atheists and agnostics.<br /><br />I had already written a comment on this, you can check the links to the references over<br /><a href="http://thesauros-store.blogspot.com/2010/04/16-solution_11.html?showComment=1271054566567#c7056989798171271901" rel="nofollow">HERE</a><br /><br />Yes, I do know how to write links in HTML, <b>UNLIKE Rod</b>. Another thing I told him already, a few weeks ago, but he did not get what I mean. For him, copy/pasting an adress is the same as writing an HTML tag that we can click on. Anyway, it's not a big surprise coming from him...World of Factshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11066732051794158264noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8308729492740986513.post-55551807891524688572010-04-17T16:42:05.184-07:002010-04-17T16:42:05.184-07:00Who are these one percenters?Who are these one percenters?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8308729492740986513.post-3370488173787397282010-04-17T16:24:53.662-07:002010-04-17T16:24:53.662-07:00An argumentum ad populum (Latin: "appeal to t...An argumentum ad populum (Latin: "appeal to the people"), in logic, is a fallacious argument that concludes a proposition to be true because many or all people believe it; it alleges, "If many believe so, it is so."The Atheist Missionaryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07191035196328725888noreply@blogger.com