“Perhaps the best argument that the Big Bang supports theism is the obvious unease with which it is greeted by some atheist physicists. At times this has led to scientific ideas being advanced with a tenacity which so exceeds their intrinsic worth that one can only suspect the operation of psychological forces lying very much deeper than the usual academic desire of a theorist to support his or her theory.”
Astrophysicist C. J. Isham
For example: “The most reasonable belief is that we came from nothing, by nothing, and for nothing.”
That’s the most reasonable belief that an atheist scientist can come up with?
To have atheist scientists say things like, “The Big Bang didn’t have a cause,” or “The Big Bang didn’t need a cause,” would be laughable if they weren’t so desperate and pathetic. Those kinds of comments certainly aren’t coming from science. They’re coming from a faith based position with no evidence to support it, a faith based position that is being promoted in a final gasp of life as science itself is proving the existence of Creator God.