Store up for yourselves treasures in Heaven
where moth and rust cannot destroy and thieves cannot break in and steal

Showing posts with label Big Bang. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Big Bang. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

When Oh When Will The Evidence Appear?

“Faith is the great cope out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and to evaluate evidence.”
Richard Dawkins

“Live Science” says of Darwinian evolution, it can turn dinosaurs into birds, apes into humans and amphibious mammals into whales.”

And yet there is not one iota of observable evidence of one “kind” of animal changing or evolving into another “kind” of animal. There is lots of evidence for adaptation within a kind (micro evolution) but zero evidence of evolution of one kind of species developing into a new kind, as described in “Live Science.”

It is only the atheist presupposition, the unsupported and anti scientific presupposition that takes adaptation (micro evolution) and forces upon us a conclusion of macro evolution.

The scientific method is based upon observation, testing and verification. It allows us to draw conclusions that don't have to accepted by faith. Evolution simply cannot be observed, tested or verified.

“We see nothing of these slow changes in progress.”
Charles Darwin.

In other words we have to accept the conclusion of evolution by faith. Much like believing that matter has always existed even though science and Big Bang cosmology says otherwise.

Of course atheists say, they must say, they have no choice BUT to say that there are “missing links out there. We just haven't found them yet.” Much as they say that they believe that an explanation that this is a material universe only will some day be found. Till then they believe it on blind faith. It's exactly like those atheist leaders who will grudgingly admit that it's impossible to make even one grain of sand out of nothing (let alone a whole universe). Yet they then say, unless you have “millions and billions of years. Then somehow the obviously impossible becomes possible.

When you can think of any observable, testable, verifiable (science) evidence for Darwinian evolution, i.e. a change of one kind into another kind, then you can believe in evolution based on something other than blind faith.

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

The Atheist's Worst Nightmare

Stephen Hawking has been fighting against Big Bang for most of his working life. It's no secret why. Big Bang is the atheist's worst nightmare. In a “Brief History of Time” Hawking states,

“So long as the universe had a beginning, we would suppose it had a creator (the cosmological argument). But if the universe is really completely self-contained, having no boundary or edge, it would have neither beginning nor end; it would simply be. What place, then, for a creator?”

To make such a scenario work, the atheist enters fantasy land. Again, Hawking, “Maybe what we call imaginary time is really more basic, and what we call real is just an idea that we invent to help us describe what we think the universe is like.”
No one really knows how Hawking justified imaginary time, nor does anyone know where his M-theory came from. The result is that Hawking says M-theory explains why we don't need God to explain our universe, and according to Hawking we don't need to account for M-theory either.

That's probably why Roger Penrose stated, “What is referred to as M-theory isn't even a theory, it's a collection of ideas, hopes and aspirations.” I'll say. The aspiration is to live in a universe without a Creator to which each and every one of us will one day be held accountable.

That fact is, there is no evidence that supports a material universe. Not a single one of the Atheist Origin of the Universe Mythologies are workable.


As mathematician Granvill Sewell explained, “It is interesting to see how those who for many years have criticized the creationists for inventing an agent external to our universe to account for the appearance of man, are now reduced to inventing other universes to explain our existence.” 

Thursday, May 30, 2013

The Big Bang is not direct proof of God’s existence, but if God exists and did create the universe, we might expect something like that. And something like the ensuing reaction of world-famous atheists in science as well. They have put a great deal of effort into developing alternative models that would point away from God. The problem is that for sixty years and more, the evidence has favored the Big Bang.

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

“I think that if [the cyclic theory of cosmology] had been a suggested by a religion, if it had been religion that first maintained the notion that all the matter in the entire universe had once been contained in an area smaller than the point of a pin, scientists probably would have laughed at the idea.”
Marilyn vos Savant, reputed to have the highest IQ ever recorded.
What's even more amazing is that the Big Bang Creation Event is something that brought the entire universe into being – when the laws of physics had nothing material to act upon. A material event taking place without the laws of physics is a working definition of a miracle.

Monday, May 20, 2013


"These men and women (those opposed to Big Bang) have built their entire worldview on atheism. When I was a student at MIT in the late 1960s, I audited a course in cosmology from the physics Nobelist Steven Weinberg. He told his class that of the theories of cosmology, he preferred the Steady State Theory because “it least resembled the account in Genesis.”
Cosmologist Frank Tipler