Stephen
Hawking has been fighting against Big Bang for most of his working
life. It's no secret why. Big Bang is the atheist's worst nightmare.
In a “Brief History of Time” Hawking states,
“So
long as the universe had a beginning, we would suppose it had a
creator (the cosmological argument). But if the universe is really
completely self-contained, having no boundary or edge, it would have
neither beginning nor end; it would simply be. What place, then, for
a creator?”
To
make such a scenario work, the atheist enters fantasy land. Again,
Hawking, “Maybe what we call imaginary time is really more basic,
and what we call real is just an idea that we invent to help us
describe what we think the universe is like.”
No
one really knows how Hawking justified imaginary time, nor does
anyone know where his M-theory came from. The result is that Hawking
says M-theory explains why we don't need God to explain our universe,
and according to Hawking we don't need to account for M-theory
either.
That's
probably why Roger Penrose stated, “What is referred to as M-theory
isn't even a theory, it's a collection of ideas, hopes and
aspirations.” I'll say. The aspiration is to live in a universe
without a Creator to which each and every one of us will one day be
held accountable.
That
fact is, there is no evidence that supports a material universe. Not
a single one of the Atheist Origin of the Universe Mythologies are
workable.
As
mathematician Granvill Sewell explained, “It is interesting to see
how those who for many years have criticized the creationists for
inventing an agent external to our universe to account for the
appearance of man, are now reduced to inventing other universes to
explain our existence.”
No comments:
Post a Comment