Sceptics and atheists, laugh at the very thought of a virgin (specifically Jesus' mother
Mary) becoming pregnant by the Holy Spirit. This would be impossible
for the Creator of the universe to bring about, they say, even though
your run-of-the-mill gynaecologist could make it happen, practically
in h/her office.
Mary
knew that virgins don't get pregnant. That's why she asked the angel,
“How can this be, for I am a virgin?” People of the day knew that
people aren't healed, storms aren't calmed and the dead aren't raised
by the spoken word. They knew this, but the events happened before
their very eyes. What could they do? They weren't so stupid as to
say, as is true of atheists, "Because it doesn't agree with my world-view, It didn't happen.”
This
leads to one more reason why the miracles listed in the Bible are
believable. You see, the fact that the pregnancy occurred, or that
Jesus was walking on water or that the storm was calmed is not
argued by the enemies of Jesus. What these hostile witnesses do
instead is come up with alternate explanations for what obviously
happened. They don't even attempt to say that people weren't healed,
for they obviously were healed. Instead, Jesus was accused of healing
(doing work) people on the Sabbath.
In
the face of reality, atheists are left with helpless pleas that, “It
didn't happen.” They do it in multiple areas:
When
an intelligent person wilfully abandons reason and begins to posit
finite infinities, causeless beginnings and beginningless beginnings,
I know that I’m dealing with someone involved in a desperate
attempt to avoid a philosophically unacceptable conclusion: Creator
God exists.
When an intelligent person wilfully abandons classical historical scholarship and begins to deny known and knowable facts of history, but only as they apply to the person of Jesus, I know that I’m dealing with someone who is confronted with a philosophically unacceptable conclusion: Creator God exists.
When an intelligent person claims to follow whatever ethical standard is currently in vogue and calls that a reasonable way to live, I know that I’m dealing with someone involved in a desperate, fearful attempt to avoid a philosophically unacceptable conclusion: Creator God exists.
When someone ignores Occam’s Razor and goes in search of ever more complicated solutions, abandoning one after another, after another, after another, not because of new evidence but because of a need to avoid the conclusion indicated by current evidence, and when that person never returns to a simple solution that coincides with current knowledge and common sense, I know that I’ve encountered an individual who has been confronted with a philosophically unacceptable conclusion: Creator God exists.
When an intelligent person wilfully abandons classical historical scholarship and begins to deny known and knowable facts of history, but only as they apply to the person of Jesus, I know that I’m dealing with someone who is confronted with a philosophically unacceptable conclusion: Creator God exists.
When an intelligent person claims to follow whatever ethical standard is currently in vogue and calls that a reasonable way to live, I know that I’m dealing with someone involved in a desperate, fearful attempt to avoid a philosophically unacceptable conclusion: Creator God exists.
When someone ignores Occam’s Razor and goes in search of ever more complicated solutions, abandoning one after another, after another, after another, not because of new evidence but because of a need to avoid the conclusion indicated by current evidence, and when that person never returns to a simple solution that coincides with current knowledge and common sense, I know that I’ve encountered an individual who has been confronted with a philosophically unacceptable conclusion: Creator God exists.
No comments:
Post a Comment