“What
can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.” Christopher Hitchens
Isn't
that ever the truth though? For example, when an atheist tells you
that s/he knows this is a material universe with no hint of a Creator
or any evidence for the supernatural, and when s/he asserts this
because s/he says, “Material things can begin to exist without an
external cause,” do exactly what Hitchens says. Dismiss it. Toss
it. Disregard such anti science comments because the evidence for
this assertion has never been observed, tested or verified. All we
have is an atheist driven conclusion based entirely on blind faith.
When
an atheist tells you that s/he knows this is a material universe with
no hint of a Creator or any evidence for the supernatural, and when
s/he asserts this because s/he says, “Everything material can come
from literally nothing material without a material cause,” do
exactly what Hitchens says. Dismiss it. Toss it. Disregard such anti
science comments because evidence for this assertion has never been
observed, tested or verified. All we have is an atheist driven
conclusion based entirely on blind faith.
When
an atheist tells you that s/he knows this is a material universe with
no hint of a Creator or any evidence for the supernatural, and when
s/he asserts this because s/he says, “Life evolved from inanimate,
inorganic gases,” do exactly what Hitchens says. Dismiss it. Toss
it. Disregard such anti science comments because evidence for this
assertion has never been observed, tested or verified. All we have is
an atheist driven conclusion based entirely on blind faith.
When
an atheist tells you that s/he knows this is a material universe with
no hint of a Creator or any evidence for the supernatural and when
s/he asserts this because s/he says, “the material infinite is
tenable, as does an infinite regress of cause” do exactly what Hitchens says. Dismiss it. Toss it.
Disregard such anti science comments because evidence for this
assertion has never been observed, tested or verified. All we have is
an atheist driven conclusion based entirely on blind faith.
When
an atheist tells you that s/he knows this is a material universe with
no hint of a Creator or any evidence for the supernatural and when
s/he asserts this because s/he says, “The material nothing doesn't
really mean nothing material." And when s/he says, "All the stuff that I asserted above, even those things that contradict science are true,” when you hear atheists make these kinds of claims, and they will
make these kinds of claims because their belief system depends on
such absurdities, do what Hitchens says to do. Dismiss it. Toss it.
Disregard such anti science comments because evidence for these
assertions have never been observed, tested or verified. All we have
are atheist driven conclusions based entirely on blind faith.
Finally,
when you hear atheists ask illogical questions like:
“So
when did this eternal Creator begin to exist?” OR
“So
what created this eternal Creator?”
When
you hear absurd questions like this from atheists, and you will hear
them, you know that you listening to someone whose brain has run it's
course just as Christopher Hitchens' brain finally threw up its hand
in defeat.
Well, you use the "Science" trope a lot. That is, you treat something that Aristotle or Pascal or Pasteur said as "Science", if it seems to support your intuitive explanations - even if, today, it is the laughing stock of the scientific community - which is, besides, a few million highly qualified persons all over the world, permanently exceeding the knowledge we have about reality.
ReplyDeleteYour idea of "Science" is about 150 years behind. We know so much more these days, but we still admit that much is to be done. You are a scientific defeatist. "God did it" is not an explanation, it speaks of intellectual laziness. To presume god is hiding in the ever decreasing gaps of unsolved mystery is a dangerous tactics. So many gaps have closed over the last decades, and not only Thor (the god of electrical phenomenons) is out of business.
And, finally, it's pretty difficult to come from a presumed creator of the universe, or the first self-reproducing cell to a Hebrew deity that has strange ideas about water above and water below, and claims to have created light first, and sun and stars two days later...
Not to speak about clay and ribs...