I've
pointed out before how atheists are fulfilling Biblical prophecy. We
are told in God's Word that as history winds down, not only will
there be a huge migration of people from Christianity. We're told
that this migration will happen in concert with a huge rise in
atheism and a simultaneous rise in homosexuality. I think it's kind
of cool to watch this taking place before our very eyes. But
something else is happening that is very strange.
Flannery
O'Connor wrote in her novel “Wise Blood,” about a character of
whom she said, “there was a deep, black, wordless conviction in him
that the way to avoid Jesus was to avoid sin.”
We
all want this. Witness how excited atheists are over the
misconception of what Pope Francis said regarding their goodness.
Every religion but Christianity depends on self-salvation through
good deeds. Only Jesus brought to us the concept of Grace; something
that no human on earth would or even could invent.
The
self-salvation paradigm goes like this. You don't need Jesus as
Saviour if you keep all the moral laws. In fact, if you keep all the
moral laws, God owes you. If you're good enough, then God is
obligated to give you what you ask for. He owes you health. He owes
you wealth. And most of all, God owes you a pass to heaven. Grace
might be essential for some people, but not for you. If you're good
enough, or so this theory goes, you can save yourself. Oh sure, Jesus
might be your friend. He might even be your mentor and inspiration
for living, but one thing Jesus is not, under this plan. He is not
your Saviour.
I
haven't seen anyone attempt to act this out within Protestant
Christianity, although it's ubiquitous in the functional atheist
community. What I have seen of late however is men and women who
claim to be Christians, who are angry at God. They're angry at God
because based on their degree of “goodness,” and based upon their degree of effort to obey Jesus, they believe that He
owes them. He doesn't owe them salvation. They don't go that far, but
he does owe them the worldly picture of a good life. This trend is
new. I rarely saw this absurd thinking back in the day. Now I see it
almost on a weekly basis in those with whom I work.
Now,
it's no doubt that these people are experiencing hardship. They
wouldn't come to a counsellor if life was easy. Loss of a business.
Marriage breakdown. A child in trouble with the law. The death of a
loved one. These people are experiencing the norms of life on earth.
The strange thing is however, they are mad at God because of difficulties being present in their lives.
That
kind of thing is par for the course for atheists, but for Christians?
Seriously?
Something
is seriously wrong in what these people have been taught regarding
our relationship with Creator God.
Somehow
these people have forgotten that God hates the proud but gives grace
to the humble.
Somehow
these people have missed the purpose of sorrow and loss and suffering
and pain.
Something
very strange is going on in the Christian Church in North America.
It may come as a surprise to you, but I can assure you that Atheists neither think much about god, nor do they expect any gratification from him - he's an imaginary being.
ReplyDeleteAtheists in distress don't have the idea that god does something to them, is unjust or whatnot - he's an imaginary being.
Most Atheists have a strong set of moral convictions, of what's good and bad. That overlaps in greater part with what Christians hold to be good and bad. But god plays no role in that - he's an imaginary being.
So all the whining you describe is apparently an inner-Christian affair.
The theological discussion about good works and their consequences is a bit more complex than you make it sound. Ignorance is not a virtue.
But to Atheists this whole discussion about good works vs. grace is just a play with words. We don't care about god and potential rewards in an afterlife. We're pretty sure no such thing exists.
We care about victims because they are fellow human beings, and we would like to be cared for, were we in that sorry situation. It's a concept called reciprocity, do as you want to be done, and your imaginary deity plays no role in it.
he's an imaginary being."
ReplyDeleteWhen you have one single piece of scientific evidence that this can be a material universe only, THEN you can start to say that.